Lack of contemporary technology and innovation leads to increase in the number of fatal encounters between criminals and police
Yesterday, I happened to read articles on the THE EDIT PAGE of Hindustan Times (28.6.2006). The articles were basically about the purported indulgence of Police in staged encounters to ensure the elimination of dreaded terrorists. Although it may be difficult or rather impossible to prove anything in a court of law, but probably, it would be closer to the truth to admit, that at times, such things do happen. I am not one to shed tears for the so called suppression of the sacrosanct human rights of terrorists who may have suppressed the human rights of a score of people and / or in all probability would be doing so, had they remained alive. But the basic issue remains substantially unaddressed.
My contention is that lack of contemporary technology and innovation leads to increase in the number of fatal encounters between criminals and police. I also believe that continuous improvement and technological innovations are the two most important tools to ensure the continued relevance of an entity. Any slip up, and the relevance of the concerned entity starts getting eroded.
Most of the proponents of staged encounters argue that it rids the society of the dangerous and damaging elements with great speed and is an effective solution. I do agree, but it is also a fact that to err is human and to control that propensity towards committing errors, proper checks and effective controls are sorely and surely needed to be in place. It is also an undeniable fact that at times, the checks and controls tie down the hands of the law enforcers to such an extent that action becomes impossible, but then that is the issue. Why not evolve methods which provide law enforcing agencies (off course Police force included) the finesse to ensure that the checks and controls do not hamper their work when that work or action is in the right direction?
Well, any attempt at evolving methods and changing the existing outdated protocols governing any police action / role will first and foremost require a drastic and complete paradigm shift. To start with, it will be imperative to ensure that the leadership at the lowest functional unit is adequately educated, adequately intelligent, sufficiently motivated and comprehensively trained. This will require a total rethink in the process of recruitment, training and compensation – a very difficult, may be an impossible task for the current policy makers and decision makers as long as they do not elect to move out of their well entrenched comfort zone. Anyway, till there is some rationalization in this direction, we will keep seeing the talented people joining the Private Sector where some of them will become delinquents (aided by all the technology available at their beck and call) and the less talented, ill motivated and ill trained law enforcers making a vain attempt at chasing them.
I wish to share an illustrative example to describe how bad the situation has become. A few months back there was a news report which stated that Digital Cameras were provided at some of the Police Stations in Mumbai but the same were not being utilized as the personnel had not been trained in its use. This issue, although a hilarious one at the superficial level, also has a very serious dimension at another level. Just ponder over the following proposition- hand over a reasonably advanced Digital Camera alongwith its operation manual to a reasonably intelligent eighth grader who has some exposure / knowledge of Computers – in all probability the child will not only be able to operate it but will also be able to access most of its advanced features within a few minutes. Now, I hope you get to understand the depth of the problem. Our law enforcers just do not make the cut. The fault does not lie with them, but with their top brass and the policy makers, who suffer not only from hitherto incurable myopia but also have severely clouded vision due to severe cataract.
As far as enhancing the quality of human resources is concerned, a very simple solution would be to adopt the recruitment standards and training methods that the armed forces follow at the level of Trainee Commissioned Officers / Gentlemen Cadets, and start equating the rank of Police Sub Inspector with the rank of 2nd Lieutenant in the Army. The only proverbial fly in the ointment will be the question of accommodating the I.P.S. officers- this problem is a solution in itself – give the rank of I.P.S. officers to all the officers of the level of Sub Inspectors with prospective effect i.e, to all new recruits. Over a period of time, this one step will reverse almost all the problems related to poorly motivated, inadequately trained and intellectually mediocre personnel that we see in the ranks of the Police Force, especially at the cutting edge. Please understand, the increased compensation package will be more than justified by the radically improved standards of policing and the resultant hugely favourable law and order situation.
My other contention, in continuation of the post dated 20.6.2006 ("Mera Bharat Mahan- world force in information tech" but complete lack of tech savviness where it matters), is that unless the latest and the dominant technology is harnessed in the right earnest, the law enforcement agencies will keep on losing. The continual loss will keep on increasing the pressure and will result in the Law enforcers’ conscious circumvention of the straight and narrow path of rectitude. The net result –poorly organized action, improper investigation, delay in completion of investigation, feeble prosecution- resulting in poor rate of conviction in court of law – increasing frustration, stress, pressure – staged encounters, torture, illegal detentions etc.
An earnest suggestion regarding the employment of contemporary technology is as follows –
¨ To begin with make all the police stations and police vehicles internet enabled and comprehensively networked.
¨ Provide G.P.S. system to every mobile unit / detachment and ensure that it remains functional at all time.
¨ Install cameras (with sizeable storage) at the police stations as well as the vehicles; also provide digital cameras with video recording capability to every mobile unit / detachment so that continuous record of proceedings can be made and stored. This recording may be scrutinized at different levels and relevant portions may be preserved for future reference.
¨ The data capturing, storage and access system should be holistically designed in such a manner that it is resistant to manipulation- access should be controlled in a rational manner.
¨ Ensure that all the data storage- text or speech or video, is done properly. All transactions and records are stored in the electronic format with foolproof time and date stamp (in electronic form) and access to relevant portion is allowed to the general public.
Please do not feel that the proposal is too complex or too costly or too difficult to effect. The technological advancements are such and the costs have come down to such levels that, it would cost the proverbial peanuts to carry out, but will definitely require a very strong and astute top management to make the change acceptable to all and sundry. The challenge lies in managing the human resources’ general reluctance, aversion and hostility towards change. And, in this case, owing to poorly trained manpower it may assume another dimension – the training and orientation would be very difficult unless carried out in a scientific manner taking into account all aspects of human behaviour.
Another idea, provide every policeman from top to bottom with a personal communication tool such as a cell phone. Again, an unthinkable proposition a few years back, but, atleast in the metros, a very cheap and workable solution at the moment. At the present cost, with some amount of negotiation with the commercial players, it should not cost more that five hundred to a thousand rupees as one time capital cost (Cell Phone Instrument) per person, and thereafter, may be fifty to hundred rupees per person per month as recurring cost. Off course usage will have to be rationally limited and graded as per need. This is again peanuts but may considerably enhance the productivity and efficacy.
Thirdly, evolve and formulate legislation to modify and develop the existing statutes to an extent where cognizance of changing technological environment is assured. Why should a court of law not accept the evidence in the shape of a video recording when the system is certified to be free of manipulation but accept the evidence given by illiterates and obscure persons in the shape of a panchanama? These issues need to be addressed ASAP, and believe me, once such issues are addressed and resolved, the need for staged encounters will be eliminated.
Till then, watch “Ab Tak Chhappan”, and “Gangajal”.

